A
FACTS ONLY — no recommendations

Blockchain ticketing: the record, in facts

A factual summary of what has actually happened in blockchain/Web3 ticketing, 2016–2026: 87 named projects and their documented fates, a reverse census of 69 conventional ticketing companies, the recurring failure modes, and the operating survivors. Every claim carries a source; inferred statuses are marked. This page states facts and measurements only — it makes no recommendation.

Key facts at a glance
  • 87 blockchain-ticketing projects are named and traced on this page (of '~160' that GET Protocol claims came and went). In the 69-project census: 36 operating, 20 dormant, 7 pivoted out, 4 confirmed dead, 2 acquired.
  • By model: projects that hide the chain and sell B2B into existing distribution show ~76% still operating; consumer-facing chain-forward builds show ~46% (found sample, survivor-biased).
  • Of 69 real ticketing companies surveyed, 40 (58%) show no blockchain trace at all; of the 29 that touched it, 16 shelved or abandoned the effort; ~0 produce publicly measurable on-chain activity today.
  • The largest operational success (GET/OPEN: 5–6M on-chain tickets since 2016) coexists with a −98.9% token price from its 2024 peak; the biggest incumbent program (Ticketmaster × Flow) minted ~15M NFTs into custodial wallets.

Census A: 69 MORE named projects (agent-swept, source-verified)

Five search modalities (ICO archives, NFT-wave coverage, enterprise pilots, per-chain ecosystems, JP/KR/CN + 2024-26 cohort) surfaced 69 additional named projects beyond the 18 above — 87 named in total against GET's '~160' claim. Survivorship bias cuts BOTH ways in this sample: live companies are easier to find than dead 2018 token sales, so the true dead-share of the full 160 is HIGHER than shown here.

20
dormant
4
dead
7
pivoted
2
acquired
36
alive
Survival rate by MODEL (found sample, n=69) — the pattern, quantified
B2B, chain-hidden13/17 alive = 76%
collectible add-on8/17 alive = 47%
consumer, chain-forward12/26 alive = 46%
infra3/9 alive = 33%

In this sample, B2B chain-hidden projects show ~76% still operating vs ~46% for consumer chain-forward builds. (Caveat: 'alive' means operating, not thriving; and the found-sample overweights survivors.)

Census B (the reverse angle): 69 REAL Web2 ticketing companies × blockchain evidence

Instead of listing Web3 projects, we enumerated the actual ticketing industry (US majors, Europe, Asia-Pacific incl. Japanese/Korean sources, sports/venues/LatAm) and searched each company for ANY blockchain trace — acquisition, pilot, NFT drop, partnership — then asked whether any resulting activity is measurable on-chain today.

40/69
no blockchain trace at all (58%)
16/29
of those that touched it: shelved/abandoned (55%)
13
still active in some form
≈0
with meaningfully measurable PUBLIC on-chain activity

On measurability: the biggest 'active' program (Ticketmaster × Flow, ~15M collectible mints by 2023) sits in custodial Dapper wallets; UEFA/TIXnGO runs on private infrastructure; MLB's Candy promos ended with the vendor. Across the surveyed industry, blockchain adoption produced almost no publicly measurable on-chain activity.

18 consequential cases, traced individually

◎ = documented (acquisition/shutdown/pivot on record) · △ = inferred from public silence (dead domain, dormant socials, token near zero). Traced 2026-07-06.

ProjectEraChainFate
Blocktix (TIX)2017 ICOEthereum◎ dead — token & project defunct
EventChain (EVC)2017 ICOEthereum△ dead — token inactive, project silent for years
Crypto.tickets (TKT)2017 ICOEthereum△ dead/dormant
Festy2017–18Dash△ dead
Aventus (AVT)2017 ICOEthereum→Polkadot◎ pivoted out of ticketing to enterprise chain infrastructure
Upgraded2016–18Ethereum◎ acquired by Ticketmaster (2018); no blockchain ticketing product followed publicly
Big Neon2018–20Tari-adjacent◎ shut down (~2020)
True Tickets2018–IBM-stack△ operates and grows as digital ticketing; current marketing does not mention blockchain (7M+ tickets, ARR $2.6M 2024)
Blockparty (BOXX)2018–21Ethereum△ pivoted to NFT marketplace, then dormant
GUTS Tickets / GET Protocol2016–25ETH→Polygon◎ pivoted to white-label B2B; GUTS arm acquired by CM.com (Feb 2025)
YellowHeart (HRTS)2021–22ETH/Polygon△ near-dormant after the NFT winter; token collapsed
SeatLab (SEAT)2021–23Cardano△ dormant
Centaurify (CENT)2021–22Ethereum△ token near zero, activity minimal
NFT-TiX2021–23Ethereum△ dormant
Afterparty2021–23Solana/ETH◎ pivoted out of NFT ticketing (to AI-creator tools)
tokenproof2022–24multi◎ token-gating infra — announced sunset (2024)
Ticketmaster × Flow2022–23Flow◎ scaled back to niche token-gating after the NFT winter
Oveit / Ticket Fairy2018–22various△ both operate as conventional ticketing — crypto features shelved

Recurring failure modes (as documented)

Token-first funding (2017–18 ICO class)

Raised from token buyers rather than customers; requiring fans/organizers to use a token added friction; the 2018 downturn ended runways.

Wallet friction at the venue door

Consumer flows requiring wallets/gas at entry did not displace QR codes; entry must work offline for all attendees.

Distribution over technology

Incumbents hold venue contracts and primary inventory; startups had working technology and no inventory. Ticketmaster acquired Upgraded (2018); no public blockchain ticketing product followed.

Anti-scalping vs rights-holder economics

Resale revenue is a feature for rights holders; scalping-resistance products faced buyers whose economics they opposed.

NFT-market correlation (2021–22 class)

Projects funded and framed as NFT plays contracted with the NFT market itself.

The surviving configuration and its two documented outcomes

Operating survivors hide the chain and sell B2B into existing distribution (GET white-label, UEFA×TIXnGO, True Tickets×Shubert, Sympla×Polygon). Two outcomes recur in this group: economic value accrues to the ticketing company rather than the chain (GET: 5M tickets, token −98.9%), and the blockchain layer is de-emphasized or removed over time (True Tickets' marketing, Ticketmaster's shelving).

Fact-check: does Brazil's largest ticketing platform run on blockchain?

✔ Substantially TRUE — with factual caveats

Sympla (15M active users, ~40M tickets/yr) tokenizes tickets as NFTs for anti-counterfeiting, on Polygon with Lumx. Live since 2024 on select events; described as an active feature on Sympla's own site as of 23 Apr 2026. Caveats: the NFT-ticket count is not disclosed; tokenization runs on a subset of events; buyers are not told the ticket is tokenized; the chain chosen is Polygon (EVM).

Sources: Mundo Conectado, Exame, Jornal de Brasília (2024–2026).

Notable operating cases, side by side

CaseChainModelScaleStatus 2026
GET Protocol → OPENOwn chain / EVM (hidden)Infrastructure sold to organizers; crypto hidden5.5–6M tickets · 20k+ events since 2016Operating; OPN token −98.9% from ATH; GUTS arm acquired by CM.com (Feb 2025)
UEFA × SecuTix/TIXnGOprivate chain (hidden)Established ticketing vendor adds a blockchain layer for a rights holder~1M mobile tickets at Euro 2020Partnership renewed through 2029
Sympla (Brazil)Polygon + LumxExisting platform tokenizes tickets for anti-fraud (invisible to buyers)Platform total ~40M tickets/yr; NFT-ticket count not disclosedDescribed as active on Sympla's site as of Apr 2026; select events
True Tickets × ShubertIBM-stack origin (hidden)B2B white-label for Broadway/performing-arts distribution7M+ tickets delivered · $2.6M ARR (2024)Growing; current marketing does not mention blockchain
TicketmasterFlow / EthereumCommemorative NFTs and token-gated sales as add-on features~15M NFTs minted by 2023 (custodial wallets)Program persists low-key; core ticketing not on-chain. Acquired blockchain-ticketing startup Upgraded in 2018.
KYD LabsSolanaNFT ticketing startupStated at Breakpoint 2025: 'NFT ticketing doesn't work — we're selling to Ticketmaster'
Method: two multi-agent sweeps (five search modalities for Web3 projects; four regional/segment sweeps for conventional ticketing companies), each claim verified against a primary or secondary source, 2026-07-06 → 07-10. Inferred statuses are marked △. This page is informational only and contains no recommendation or advice.